Site Tools


start:issecurebootworking

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
start:issecurebootworking [2023/08/30 14:09] peterstart:issecurebootworking [2024/04/24 13:27] (current) admin
Line 1: Line 1:
 +NOTE ON 24-April-2024
 +Honestly secure boot is super annoying on Debian. In Ubuntu its automatic, but Debian everytime there is a kernel or Nvidia driver update you have to manually resign all the drivers which I find of questionable value. Im not sure what security benefit is actually being achieved here, at high cost and annoyance. Also the signing code has stopped working due to some bug at the moment so its not even super reliable when you cant sign your graphics drivers because devs are working on fixing bugs in the code. I recommend not using secure boot on Debian testing. If you absolutely have to have this then you can try fiddling around with the below guide, or using Debian or Ubuntu stable. I tried it for a few years but it was always annoying and provided no tangible benefit.
 +
 DATE CHECKED THIS PAGE WAS VALID: 30/08/2023  DATE CHECKED THIS PAGE WAS VALID: 30/08/2023 
  
Line 77: Line 80:
 SHORT_VERSION="$(uname -r | cut -d - -f 1-2)" SHORT_VERSION="$(uname -r | cut -d - -f 1-2)"
 </code> </code>
-This means ls /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-$SHORT_VERSION can provide a valid directory. This might keep changing I am unsure so leaving this up. If you blindly copy and paste without checking the directory exists you will get errors like sudo: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.4/scripts/sign-file: command not found+This means "ls /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-$SHORT_VERSIONcan provide a valid directory. This might keep changing I am unsure so leaving this up. If you blindly copy and paste without checking the directory exists you will get errors like sudo: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.4/scripts/sign-file: command not found
  
  
-Very important - after you type the next command it asks you for a password, but its not obvious that its asking for a password, the terminal just sits and waits for input. Us the same password you used before when setting up Mok for the BIOS to avoid confusion:+Very important - after you type the next command it asks you for a password, but its not obvious that its asking for a password, the terminal just sits and waits for input. Use the same password you used before when setting up Mok for the BIOS to avoid confusion:
  
 <code> <code>
start/issecurebootworking.1693404575.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/08/30 14:09 by peter